Author: fishbok

During this week, I have read two interesting readings regarding the Floe Inclusive Learning Design Handbook. It exists as a free Open Educational Resource (OER) that is designed to support the community consisting of people that need to creating adaptable and personalizable educational resources. People like instructors, Web developers, content creators, etc can utilize Floe Inclusive Learning Design as a tool to build a variety of learning preferences to serve the individual needs. In this handbook, I have discovered a couple of fascinating concepts, ideas, and issues and I will talk about 3 of them.

First of all, I think a very interesting idea is Design for Privacy.
Design for Privacy involves Establishing the authority of online individual privacy toward the controls of the users. It is an essential feature of comprehensive design. Several services platforms do not provide an adequate level of authority over the user’s privacy. Sometimes, even when a Platform explicitly calls its privacy policy, it is often exhibited in legalese or in another language that is complicated or uncertain. This prospect is a very different and new perspective to me, and it is also something important but always get Neglect by designers. Many people around me avoid using services like online shopping and online banking due to concern about the leak of their personal information. This is the situation that I can highly relate to. I prefer designs that allow me to make my own decisions. Users have the right to deny sharing their info, and they should be respected.

Secondly, an important idea is The Importance of Natural Language. Ensuring all the base content is accompanied by a natural language equivalent. It is one of the key principles behind providing transformable learning content. the text often acts as the lowest common denominator for learning material since text can easily be both visual and aural, and conversions between the two can be automated. Therefore Natural language content is immensely malleable and functional in many different contexts

The third important idea that I’m going to talk about is The 80/20 Principle. The 80/20 Principle (also known as the Pareto principle rule, the law of the vital few, or the principle of factor sparsity). This law applies to multiple fields like in economy, In sport, in computing, etc.

To create a design that will be covering 80% of the dots (or needs), you will only be needing to cover 20% of the space. This sounds very reasonable and efficient. This law allows for quick wins and obeys manufacturing markets and mass production well.

After reading two readings, I have notices that there are two concepts that I have trouble understanding. The first one is the Metadata. I am still confused by the definition and property of metadata. The second one is the Creative Commons 2.5 Canada License. I am having trouble understanding this license is and the reason for all content in the Handbook is licensed under it.

Finally, I have the last question that is about the Issues and Controversies Considering Cognitive Needs. Can cognitive accessibility be examined accurately and affordably? Is it necessary to test it?

Have you ever wonder At most how many people can learn synchronically? Now that technology has been developing Swiftly, it altered the way of our living habits in so many different ways. As the passing of knowledge to the newest generation is crucial in our culture, online knowledge gaining became a key factor that people have put their effort into integrating it.

As a statistics student, there is a mandatory course called math 248 that I had to pass. This course is all about utilizing programming tools to write codes that can be used to pull, organize and analyze data that could be useful. the programming tool that is now used for this course is Python, which has a different syntax form with the programming tool Java that I was taught from a year ago. This is reasonable because the coding industry is developing very fast, but it also takes me more time to understand and get used to the syntax in Python.

In order to better get used to the skill of utilizing python, I decided to go for tutorials on the Mooc platform Udacity. Through this course, I feel the style of the Udacity course. Through Udacity, People from all over the world can register online and participate in classes, and it’s often free.

It can be said that Udacity is relatively conscientious. Even for the free courses on Udacity, the quality of the content is very high. The most consequential feeling for me is that the “practical” nature of Udacity courses is very powerful. Moreover, the experience of the course was magnificent, for the first time I felt the “interactive” power of MOOC. The tutorial does not simply let you watch the video but has a lot of real-time interactions, such as in every 10 minutes, the instructor will ask you a question, or let you write a piece of code.

The object of Mooc is, the instructor is talking in a way that is easier for me to understand. He is not like many university teachers that follow the text-books. the instructor also likes to uses a lot of ” humor” melodrama, dialogues, interviews, etc in the course. All these adds up and creates a very nice learning environment for “Noob ” students that have zero knowledge of the contents.

I personally feel that In most of the Udacity courses, theory and practice are pretty well combined, and there are quite a lot of very practical courses. In some online courses, I can see that the instructors are really trying hard to make breakthroughs and come up with new ideas in various forms and content. but In other courses, It feels that the instructors just pulled the contents of the lectures directly from the classroom to online.

Also，the most direct benefit from learning through MOOC is that you get the chance to pause whenever needed. learners get the chance to go over the contents regularly until they understand. If learners can take a good advantage out of it, it can be extremely beneficial to learners.

The heart of open education is about sharing resources. This term is usually used for the mix of educational resources, practices, policies, and communities that can provide board access to opportunities for everyone. In terms of What open means particularly is that it is not just that the resource is free but that it also comes with a set of permissions about how you can use that resource.

Open education resources are teaching, learning and research materials in any medium: digital or otherwise that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license. they permit no-cost access to adaptation and redistribution by others with no limited restriction.

we are now in this much more information abundant, resource abundant era of the Internet. Many creators are challenged by the consequences brought to us by the well-developed internet. many creators are mostly facing copyright issues about how products of human creativity are used. Products of human creativity can be any stuff. it can be logos, academics books, articles, music, arts, etc. The copyright law grants an exclusive set of rights to the creator of products so that the creator can prevent others from copying or adopting her work for a set amount of time.

So while copyright places restrictions on showing creations online, the Internet provides plenty of opportunities to share active resources to collaborate on creations. The Creative Commons is one of the licenses that help creators around the world to share their works legally. Open licenses have been used by different global movements and urban education in culture government size art etc. The license usually is under the global standard.

Here is a model created by Andrew Duffy. (http://www.oercommons.org/courses/constant-acceleration-same-physics/view) It is a 2D model on the relationship between time and displacement in various conditions. There is a cc license logo by the materials meaning it has a license. It is very helpful when it comes to understanding the basic yet important concept of physics in an efficient but simple way.

It is a very well made model with very clear content and various display options. The user can view and even compare the distribution of velocity under different conditions. This material is suitable for teachers to display in their lectures to help their students obtain a better understanding without having to spend a whole lot of time to build a model like that. It is also very handy for learners if they wish to get access to good material created by experts outside the school. I used this resource for better knowledge over the linear relationship between time and displacement, and this resource helped me a lot in my physics class.

To me, it is a good OER. The material perfectly addresses the information that I am looking for. by exploring the physics model I get to set the time and observe the displacement myself, and it is quite fun. It is simple but professionally accurate. the quality is also nice. It enables me to observe the differences between different motions. The model is not accessible enough since it can not be downloaded and used in a PowerPoint. it can only be run on browsers.

Just like all other OERs, This physics model is about using all the resources to extend our collaborative inclusive accessible and active learning.It gives more opportunities for students and teachers.

Now that technology Is developing Rapidly, it changed the way of our living style in so many different approaches. As the passing of knowledge to the newest generation is critical in our society, education became a key factor that people have put their effort into integrating it. After reading the Basic philosophies of online learning I discovered some fascinating thoughts and concepts out of it that are new to me.

Instructor-centered versus student-centered learning 

As an international student who grew up in China, I experienced synchronous learning and did not have choices on the courses that need to be taken each term. The province publishes a version of textbooks and materials designed to make every single kid in the same grade learn the same topic at the same phase of a term. After I came to Canada, I was surprised that Canadian high schools allow students to decide which 4 courses they wanna take in one semester. This way, courses become very flexible and students also learn to plan for their future. And one day, I heard about the website called khan academy which covers diverse topics and is open for everyone, which is on another stage of asynchronous learning. EDCI339 is the first online course that I have taken in. I am fascinated by the idea of A because I believe that every people have their preferred ways of learning. Through asynchronous learning, I no longer have to force my self to take notes flying and end up with unreadable messy notes just to catch my professor’s handwriting speed.

Asynchronous versus synchronous learning 

In my opinion, the largest difference between a typical high school course and a university course is that A high school course is usually instructor-centered and a university course is often a mixture of instructor and student-centered. In the previous years, There were not many resources for the instructor to utilize and therefore it was not realistic for them to teach any knowledge other than the textbook contents. Slowly due to the development of the internet, the instructors can not only pass the knowledge to students but also helped the students to gain the ability of self-learning. There are always great resources online that can be used to improve one’s knowledge. I have taken several courses that direct the students to work on a certain project in a group. This way, students often need to research the topics on themselves and gradually learned how to learn things on their own.

 Connectivism

Connectivism is one of the most critical learning theories in this era. With its help, learning can be accomplished in a much more efficient and enjoyable way. In a few words, Connectivism indicates that one can gain the information that he/she obliges through numerous resources on the Internet. He/she can then pass the knowledge He/she has learned along with his/her new opinion to other people online or in-person. for example, GitHub is a perfect Connectivism platform for programmers to discuss the difficulties in programming. in my opinion the pros of Connectivism burden the cons. On the Internet, people can gather knowledge from everywhere in the world on almost every topic, and everyone’s thoughts can be distributed online through the network.

The network has promoted the development of open learning, and open learning supplemented our ability to discover everything we are curious about. I truly believe it will persist beneficial to me in my entire life.